01
Game design
Mechanics and math
Core loop, RTP, volatility, payout logic, feature triggers, and exposure model.
Mechanic sketch + math sheet
iGaming Games
Rollix Game Studio
We build slot games from idea to playable launch: art direction, math, PixiJS client, backend runtime, iframe launch, wallet flow, and QA handoff.
- Two demo games live now
- Slot client and backend shipped together
- Clean handoff for operator launch
Studio board
Slots that look finished and run in production.
Lucky Fortune
Asian slot with fast reads and clear bonus states
Tiny Mouse Bakery
Warm fantasy slot built around collection moments
Custom slots
Theme, symbols, math, client, backend
Operator builds
Launch-ready iframe flow and wallet contract
01
Game
02
Math
03
Client
04
Launch
Game art
Theme, symbols, UI states, animation direction
Math
RTP, volatility, payout table, feature rules
Runtime
Iframe launch, session state, wallet calls, QA checks
Game Capabilities
One focused production path from game concept to launch
Rollix is structured around the work that makes an iGaming game shippable: game design, math, art direction, client runtime, backend integration, QA traces, and launch handoff. The output is a playable artifact, not another polished pitch deck.
Scope a game project02
Visual world
Art direction
Theme, symbols, UI mood, motion language, and branded presentation system.
Mood frame + symbol language
03
Runtime
Game client
Responsive game shell, animation states, round feedback, and mobile-first UX.
Playable state map
04
Systems
Backend integration
Wallet, callbacks, session flow, configuration, staging, and partner handoff.
Integration scope
05
Validation
QA and traces
Round states, payouts, settlement, recovery paths, and launch acceptance checks.
QA trace checklist
06
Release
Launch support
Build package, rollout notes, production triage, and post-launch follow-up.
Launch handoff
Game output
Playable prototype, math notes, integration scope, launch checklist.
The game review starts from artifacts.
A serious conversation should show mechanic notes, payout assumptions, art direction, runtime states, integration risk, and the launch checklist in the same room.
Game Showcase
Game feel, math intent, and launch risk in one review
Each study is framed like an early production artifact: enough visual direction to judge the feel, enough math and integration detail to know whether it can ship.
- Playable state map, not a marketing mockup
- Payout assumptions and volatility notes shown next to the visual direction
- Wallet, callbacks, QA traces, and rollout risks reviewed before build handoff
Live gameR1
LF
7
CO
W
DR
Game format study
Lucky Fortune
Chinese-themed real-money game direction with a 5x5 grid, lucky-symbol rhythm, respins, and premium fortune visuals.
96.3 RTP5x5Respins
Live gameR2
M
B
W
Q
K
Game format study
Tiny Mouse Bakery
Warm bakery-themed cascade game with compact character appeal, symbol drops, layered wins, and a softer visual tone.
96.4 RTPCascades5x3
Game review package
Format range, game feel, math intent, integration risk, and launch artifacts in one room.
Why Rollix
A focused studio model for teams that need iGaming games shipped cleanly
Rollix is strongest when the buyer needs production ownership: creative direction, math, engineering, QA, and partner launch support in one accountable workflow.
Criteria
Build in-house
Fragmented vendors
Rollix
Delivery ownership
Internal teams split across product, math, art, and engineering
Multiple vendors with handoff gaps
One studio scope from concept to launch
Game quality
Depends on available specialist capacity
Visual work often separated from math and runtime behavior
Mechanics, math, art, and client states reviewed together
Launch risk
Integration issues appear late in production
Provider requirements discovered after creative approval
Wallet, callbacks, QA traces, and rollout checks are planned early
Stakeholder clarity
Product, design, and engineering can report different status
Each supplier shows only their part
One production board for scope, risks, build state, and launch tasks
Delivery ownership
- Build in-house
- Internal teams split across product, math, art, and engineering
- Fragmented vendors
- Multiple vendors with handoff gaps
- Rollix
- One studio scope from concept to launch
Game quality
- Build in-house
- Depends on available specialist capacity
- Fragmented vendors
- Visual work often separated from math and runtime behavior
- Rollix
- Mechanics, math, art, and client states reviewed together
Launch risk
- Build in-house
- Integration issues appear late in production
- Fragmented vendors
- Provider requirements discovered after creative approval
- Rollix
- Wallet, callbacks, QA traces, and rollout checks are planned early
Stakeholder clarity
- Build in-house
- Product, design, and engineering can report different status
- Fragmented vendors
- Each supplier shows only their part
- Rollix
- One production board for scope, risks, build state, and launch tasks
Technical Credibility
Technical proof for a game that has to run in production
The landing should make engineering confidence visible: game contracts, wallet behavior, math review, QA traces, and launch operations appear before a buyer needs to ask.
Delivery artifact
Launch checklist
Game standard
Traceable round flow
Game API contract
OpenAPI-backed integration notes for launch, wallet, session, and game state flows
Wallet and callbacks
Round settlement, callback traces, and partner integration states are visible in delivery
Math testability
RTP, volatility, payout behavior, and edge states are reviewed as production artifacts
Launch operations
Build package, staging notes, QA checklist, and rollout ownership stay tied to the game
Buyer takeaway
Rollix is presented as a production studio with a verifiable launch path, not only a creative team producing game visuals.
Games Next Step
Bring a game concept, market target, or launch requirement.
Rollix can help turn it into a production scope with mechanics, math, game client, backend integration, QA traces, and partner launch support.